Balaay vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone)

An evidence-labelled comparison of Balaay and Quo (formerly OpenPhone): what each is verified to do on an inbound call, published pricing where it exists, where Quo (formerly OpenPhone) is the better choice, and where Balaay is. Last verified 2026-09-06.

Quo (formerly OpenPhone) — Business phone platform with an AI receptionist (Sona). Not dental-specific. Quo (formerly OpenPhone)'s published pricing starts at from $19/user/mo, Sona included with 10 calls a month; Balaay's voice receptionist is $29/mo. The honest summary: You want a business phone system for a team — shared numbers, a shared inbox, texting, CRM logging — and an AI that covers overflow is a useful addition rather than the reason you are buying. On that ground Quo is a far more complete product than Balaay and has been shipping for seven years. The receptionist IS the product: you want it to read your site, take the booking, and prove afterwards that the booking exists. Also if you want to hear it answer as your own business before giving anyone an email address. Every competitor fact on this page carries a label saying how it was verified, and the facts were last checked on 2026-09-06.

What Quo (formerly OpenPhone) is

Quo (formerly OpenPhone) is Business phone platform with an AI receptionist (Sona). Not dental-specific. Its own stated target buyer: Small teams that want one shared business phone with an AI that answers overflow — where the phone system is the product and the AI is an add-on.

Pricing

Balaay: Starter $29/mo with 250 minutes, then $0.15/min; Growth $79/mo with 1,000 minutes, then $0.10/min; Scale $149/mo with 2,000 minutes, then $0.08/min. No mandatory setup fee — Concierge Setup is optional at $199 once. Published in full.

Quo (formerly OpenPhone): Starter $19/user/mo, Business $33, Scale $47 (monthly); $15/$23/$35 billed annually. Sona AI is included in every plan with 1,000 free automation credits a month (~10 calls); beyond that, credits are bought in five tiers — $25/mo for 4,000, $49 for 10,000, $99 for 25,000, $199 for 60,000 — with the effective rate falling from $1.00 to $0.45 a call. 100 credits per call regardless of length.

Per user, not per practice, so a five-person front desk multiplies. Sona is now included on every tier rather than being an add-on, with ten calls a month before credits are needed. Calls under 15 seconds do not count, and overages are off by default — both genuinely good.

Sources: www.quo.com, support.quo.com — accessed 2026-09-06.

Competitor pricing is from each vendor’s public pricing at the time of writing and may have changed — confirm a current quote directly. Balaay’s pricing is published in full.

Capability comparison

Read the right-hand column before the middle one. "Not found" means we could not verify it from public sources — it does not mean the vendor lacks the feature, and we will not present it as though it does. "Company claim" means the vendor says it about itself and we have not independently confirmed it.

Where Quo (formerly OpenPhone) is the better choice

Listed first, deliberately. If one of these matters to your practice, stop reading and go and talk to them.

• A mature, seven-year-old platform: shared inbox, threads, mentions, tasks, analytics, admin roles, desktop and mobile apps. Balaay has none of that and is not building it.
• Native CRM connectors — HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho, Attio, Clio, HighLevel, Jobber. Balaay has no production-verified connector at all.
• Free number porting with published per-carrier walkthroughs. Balaay does not port numbers.
• A published callable demo line anyone can ring without giving an email.
• Genuinely better trial mechanics: overages off by default, calls under 15 seconds free, and a tier upgrade retroactively re-rates the current month.
• 474 support pages and a 215-entry changelog maintained to late August 2026. Balaay publishes neither.

Choose Quo (formerly OpenPhone) when: You want a business phone system for a team — shared numbers, a shared inbox, texting, CRM logging — and an AI that covers overflow is a useful addition rather than the reason you are buying. On that ground Quo is a far more complete product than Balaay and has been shipping for seven years.

Where Balaay is the better choice

• Balaay reads the whole website. Quo's own guide says "Sona can't visit page links. You'll need to paste every website URL you think it should know."
• Balaay books into a schedule and re-reads the record to confirm it. Quo's appointment page says Sona "sends SMS messages containing a booking link" — the caller books themselves, and no calendar system is named anywhere in their docs.
• No account, no card and no ID to try it. Quo requires eight signup steps, a card with a $1 hold, and a government photo ID before basic functions work.
• Balaay never reports an action as done without reading the record back, and says so when it cannot.
• Dental depth. Quo has no dental page and surfaced for none of the vertical AI-receptionist terms tested.

Choose Balaay when: The receptionist IS the product: you want it to read your site, take the booking, and prove afterwards that the booking exists. Also if you want to hear it answer as your own business before giving anyone an email address.

What Balaay does not do

Every comparison page on this site carries this section, because a comparison in which the author has no weaknesses is an advertisement.

• No production-verified practice management system integration. Balaay does not write appointments into Dentrix, Eaglesoft, Open Dental or anything else today. Your team enters the appointment.
• No rescheduling or cancellation on the call — those callers are handed to your staff.
• English only.
• No two-way patient texting; confirmations and reminders are outbound only.
• No insurance eligibility verification against a payer.
• No published customer outcomes. Balaay is pre-pilot, and several competitors have named practices with figures attached.

Quo (formerly OpenPhone)'s own claims about its scale

Reproduced as claims, with the label that applies. None of these figures has been audited here.

• Quo claims 90,000+ businesses Company claim
• Quo claims 4.7 stars, 3,300+ reviews on G2 Company claim
• Quo claims 4.0 across 1,008 reviews on Trustpilot Third-party reported

Facts on this page were last verified on 2026-09-06. Our sourcing rules are published at /methodology, and Quo (formerly OpenPhone)'s own site is linked above so you can check anything here yourself.

See how every vendor compares → · How we verify these facts →

Related pages

• Balaay vs Dentina
• Balaay vs Arini
• Balaay vs TensorLinks
• Balaay vs Viva AI
• Balaay vs Weave
• Balaay vs Rondah AI
• vs an answering service
• vs a human receptionist
• vs voicemail
• AI Dental Receptionist
• Pricing

Explore Balaay

In summary

Balaay vs Quo (formerly OpenPhone) — An evidence-labelled comparison of Balaay and Quo (formerly OpenPhone): what each is verified to do on an inbound call, published pricing where it exists, where Quo (formerly OpenPhone) is the better choice, and where Balaay is. Last verified 2026-09-06. Balaay is an AI receptionist for businesses that run on calls. It learns the business from its website, answers the phone, takes the next step, and shows what it did.

Loading interactive experience…